Dedicated to Justice Since 1951

Stuart Negligent Security Lawyers

Negligent security claims hold property owners accountable when their failure to provide reasonable security measures contributes to criminal attacks on their premises. In Stuart, Florida, apartment complexes, hotels, shopping centers, parking garages, nightclubs, bars, and other commercial and residential properties have a legal duty to protect the people who live, work, shop, and visit there. When they cut corners on security and someone gets hurt, they can be forced to pay for the consequences. A Stuart negligent security lawyer at The Rubin Firm represents crime victims throughout Martin County who were harmed because a property owner failed to provide the security that the circumstances demanded.

You deserve answers, accountability, and compensation. Call The Rubin Firm at (772) 283-2004, submit our contact form, or start a live chat. Your consultation is free, confidential, and carries no obligation.

When Property Owners Fail to Protect You

Negligent security is a form of premises liability that arises when a property owner’s failure to provide adequate security measures allows a foreseeable criminal act to occur on their property, causing injury to someone who was lawfully present. The concept is straightforward: if a property owner knows or should know that criminal activity is likely on their property, and they fail to take reasonable steps to prevent it, they bear legal responsibility when someone gets hurt as a result.

What constitutes reasonable security depends on the specific property, its location, its history, and the nature of the foreseeable risk. A hotel in a high-crime area may need security cameras, key-card access, well-lit parking areas, and security guards. An apartment complex with a history of break-ins may need functioning locks, perimeter fencing, gated access, and exterior lighting. A nightclub that serves alcohol to large crowds may need trained door staff, surveillance systems, and protocols for handling intoxicated or aggressive patrons. The standard is not perfection. It is reasonableness in light of what the property owner knew or should have known.

What makes these cases particularly frustrating is that the security failures are often obvious in hindsight. Broken security cameras that were never repaired. Gates that stopped working months ago. Lighting in parking garages that has been out for weeks. Security guards who were removed to cut costs. These are not accidents. They are choices, and when those choices lead to violent crime, the property owner shares responsibility with the criminal.

The Rubin Firm's Approach to Negligent Security Cases

Negligent Security

Negligent security cases require a specific investigative approach that differs from standard personal injury claims. Our attorneys focus on establishing what the property owner knew about the risk of criminal activity, what security measures were in place at the time of the attack, whether those measures were reasonable given the known risk, and whether the attack would have been prevented or deterred by adequate security.

injured? Let Us Help You Get Justice. Free consultation. No fees unless we win your case.

Properties Where Negligent Security Claims Arise

Negligent Security

Office buildings and commercial properties:

Broken access control systems, absent front desk security, propped-open fire doors, and unsecured loading docks and service entrances.

College campuses and schools:

Inadequate campus security, broken emergency call stations, and poorly lit walkways and parking areas.

Negligent security claims can arise on virtually any type of property where the owner has a duty to provide reasonable security. However, certain property types are disproportionately represented in these cases because of the volume of people they attract, the hours they operate, and the nature of the activities that occur there.

Apartment complexes and condominiums:

Broken entry gates, malfunctioning locks, absent security lighting, lack of surveillance cameras, and failure to screen tenants. Residents who are attacked in common areas, parking lots, stairwells, or laundry rooms may have negligent security claims against the property owner or management company.

Hotels and motels:

Defective room locks, inadequate hallway and parking lot lighting, absent or non-functional surveillance cameras, and failure to employ security personnel during overnight hours.

Shopping centers and retail stores:

Poorly lit parking lots, lack of security patrols, non-operational cameras, and failure to respond to known patterns of criminal activity in parking areas and common spaces.

Parking garages and lots:

Dark, unsupervised structures with broken cameras, missing attendants, and inadequate emergency call stations are prime locations for robbery, carjacking, and assault.

Nightclubs, bars, and restaurants:

Failure to employ adequate security staff, inability to manage intoxicated or aggressive patrons, lack of weapons screening, and absence of surveillance systems.

Proving a Negligent Security Claim in Florida

To recover compensation in a negligent security case, you must establish four legal elements under Florida’s premises liability framework. The property owner must have owed you a duty of care, which is established by your status as a lawful visitor on the property. The owner must have known or should have known about the risk of criminal activity, based on prior incidents, crime statistics, or the nature and location of the property. The owner must have failed to implement reasonable security measures to address that foreseeable risk. And the inadequate security must have been a substantial factor in causing your injuries.

Under Florida Statutes Section 768.0755 and related premises liability provisions, the foreseeability of criminal activity is the critical element. Courts examine the history of crime on or near the property, the nature of the business, the neighborhood’s crime rate, and whether prior similar incidents put the property owner on notice. An experienced attorney builds this foreseeability case through police records, prior incident reports, crime mapping data, and expert security testimony.

Florida’s 2023 tort reform legislation, HB 837, introduced additional considerations for certain negligent security claims. Under Florida Statutes Section 768.0706, multifamily residential property owners who comply with specific safety measures, including security cameras, adequate lighting, and proper locking systems, may benefit from a presumption against liability for third-party criminal acts. This new provision raises the burden of proof for plaintiffs in certain cases, making experienced legal representation even more important for victims of negligent security at apartment complexes and similar properties.

The Psychological Impact of Crime-Related Injuries

Negligent Security

Negligent security cases differ from most other personal injury claims in one critical respect: the injuries are inflicted by a deliberate criminal act, not an accidental event. Being the victim of a robbery, an assault, a sexual attack, or another violent crime inflicts psychological harm that can be even more debilitating than the physical injuries.

Post-traumatic stress disorder is extremely common among crime victims. Flashbacks, nightmares, hypervigilance, difficulty sleeping, emotional numbness, and fear of returning to the location where the attack occurred are all hallmark symptoms of PTSD. Many victims develop anxiety disorders, depression, agoraphobia, or a generalized fear that makes it difficult to function in daily life. The psychological treatment required to address these conditions can extend for years, and for some victims, the emotional scars never fully heal.

At The Rubin Firm, we treat the psychological component of negligent security cases with the same seriousness as the physical injuries. We work with psychologists, psychiatrists, and trauma specialists to document the emotional and psychological harm, and we present that evidence as a central component of the damages claim. Insurance companies that try to dismiss PTSD, anxiety, and depression as exaggerated or temporary learn quickly that we will not tolerate that characterization.

Compensation for Negligent Security Victims in Stuart

The damages available in a negligent security case reflect both the physical and psychological impact of the attack. A negligent security attorney in Stuart at The Rubin Firm pursues every category of compensation available under Florida law.

Steps to Take After an Attack on a Property

Call 911:

Report the crime to law enforcement immediately. A police report is essential evidence in both the criminal prosecution and your civil claim.

Seek medical attention:

Get examined by a doctor, even if your physical injuries seem minor. Document both physical and emotional symptoms from the beginning.

Document the scene:

Photograph the area where the attack occurred, including security features (or the absence of them), lighting conditions, broken locks, non-functional cameras, and access points.

Identify witnesses:

Get names and contact information from anyone who saw the attack or who can describe the security conditions on the property.

Preserve evidence:

Keep any torn or bloodstained clothing and personal items. Do not alter or discard anything related to the incident.

Do not discuss the incident with the property owner's insurance:

The property owner’s insurer will attempt to minimize or deny the claim. Speak with an attorney first.

Contact The Rubin Firm:

We investigate negligent security claims immediately, preserving surveillance footage and other evidence before it can be destroyed. Call (772) 283-2004.

Types of Criminal Acts That Give Rise to Negligent Security Claims

Negligent security claims can arise from virtually any type of criminal act that occurs on a property where inadequate security contributed to the crime. The most common scenarios our firm encounters include armed robbery in parking lots and commercial properties, physical assault in bars, nightclubs, and entertainment venues, sexual assault in hotels, apartment complexes, and college dormitories, carjacking in poorly secured parking garages and commercial lots, home invasion in apartment complexes with broken access controls, and shootings in properties located in areas with known violent crime histories.

Each type of criminal act produces its own pattern of injuries and psychological consequences. Victims of sexual assault, for example, face unique psychological challenges that require specialized trauma therapy and can take years to address. Victims of armed robbery may develop severe PTSD that makes it impossible to return to the location where the crime occurred or to feel safe in any commercial setting. Shooting victims face catastrophic physical injuries that may result in permanent disability. The Rubin Firm tailors its approach to each case based on the specific crime, the specific injuries, and the specific security failures that allowed the crime to occur.

The Relationship Between Criminal Prosecution and Your Civil Claim

One question we hear frequently from negligent security clients is whether they need to wait for the criminal case against their attacker to resolve before pursuing a civil claim against the property owner. The answer is no. The criminal prosecution of the person who attacked you and the civil negligent security claim against the property owner are separate legal proceedings with different standards of proof and different objectives. The criminal case seeks to punish the attacker. The civil case seeks to compensate you for your injuries and hold the property owner accountable for the security failures that allowed the attack to happen.

In many cases, pursuing both tracks simultaneously is the most effective strategy. The criminal investigation may produce evidence, witness statements, and police reports that support the civil claim. Meanwhile, the civil investigation into the property’s security history, prior crime incidents, and maintenance records provides context that the criminal case may not explore. An experienced negligent security attorney coordinates with the criminal process where appropriate while independently building the strongest possible civil case for compensation.

We’re Here To Heil You Recover Compensation For:

Serving Negligent Security Victims Across the Treasure Coast

The Rubin Firm represents negligent security victims in Stuart, Palm City, Jensen Beach, Hobe Sound, Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce, Vero Beach, Jupiter, and throughout Martin County, St. Lucie County, Indian River County, and Palm Beach County.

Referral Partnerships for Negligent Security Cases

Attorneys who handle criminal defense or other practice areas and recognize that their client may also have a civil negligent security claim trust The Rubin Firm to pursue the additional recovery. Contact us to discuss a referral.

Frequently Asked Questions About Negligent Security Claims in Stuart

Negligent security occurs when a property owner fails to provide reasonable security measures and someone is attacked, assaulted, robbed, or otherwise harmed by criminal activity on the property as a result. The property owner is held civilly liable for the victim’s injuries because their security failure contributed to the harm.

Foreseeability is established through prior crime reports on or near the property, police call histories, crime statistics for the surrounding area, the nature of the business (such as bars or late-night establishments), and expert security testimony about what the property owner should have recognized as a foreseeable risk.

Any property where the owner has a duty to provide reasonable security, including apartment complexes, hotels, shopping centers, parking garages, nightclubs, bars, office buildings, hospitals, college campuses, and other commercial and residential properties.

No. A negligent security claim is a civil case against the property owner, not the criminal. You can pursue a negligent security claim even if the person who attacked you was never identified or apprehended. The focus of the civil claim is on the property owner’s failure to provide adequate security, not on the identity of the criminal.

Under Florida Statutes Section 95.11, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including negligent security cases, is generally two years from the date of the incident. Acting promptly is essential because surveillance footage and other evidence can be destroyed or overwritten within days.

$150 Million

Attacked Because of Inadequate Security? We Fight for You.

Property owners who cut corners on security should not escape accountability when their choices lead to violence. The Stuart negligent security lawyers at The Rubin Firm hold property owners responsible and fight for the compensation crime victims deserve.

Call (772) 283-2004 for a free consultation. Complete our contact form or chat live. There is no fee unless we win your case.

Meet Our Lawyers

Real Clients. Real Results.

icon 4.9 Rating on google

Results may vary depending on your Particular facts and legal circumstances. Based on select nationwide reviews.

Practice Areas

Our personal injury team also handles premises liability, catastrophic injuries, wrongful death, and car accidents throughout the Treasure Coast.