A stalking conviction creates a permanent record of a violent offense that affects employment, housing, custody proceedings, and firearms rights. Aggravated stalking is a third-degree felony carrying up to five years in prison. And the civil injunctions that frequently accompany stalking allegations impose restrictions on your movement, your communication, and your daily life that can last indefinitely. What makes stalking cases particularly challenging for defendants is the subjective nature of the allegations: the charge hinges on whether the alleged victim experienced substantial emotional distress, a standard that depends heavily on the accuser’s own account of their feelings rather than objective evidence of threatening conduct. A Stuart stalking and harassment lawyer at The Rubin Firm challenges the subjective elements of these charges, investigates the accuser’s credibility and motivation, and fights to protect clients from convictions that would brand them as predators.
If you are facing stalking or harassment charges, contact The Rubin Firm at (772) 283-2004, complete our contact form, or start a live chat.
How Florida Defines Stalking
Under Florida Statutes Section 784.048, stalking is defined as willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly following, harassing, or cyberstalking another person. The statute requires a pattern of conduct: a single incident, no matter how alarming, does not constitute stalking. The conduct must be repeated, and it must be directed at a specific person. Harassment is defined within the statute as engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that serves no legitimate purpose and that causes substantial emotional distress to that person.
The statute creates several distinct offenses of escalating severity. Simple stalking is a first-degree misdemeanor carrying up to one year in jail. Aggravated stalking, which involves making a credible threat to the victim, stalking a minor under 16, or stalking in violation of a court order such as an injunction for protection, is a third-degree felony carrying up to five years in prison. Cyberstalking, which involves using electronic communication to harass, is treated as stalking under the same statute and carries the same penalties based on the specific circumstances.
The Subjectivity Problem in Stalking Cases
The most significant challenge in defending stalking charges is the subjective nature of the emotional distress element. The prosecution must prove that the defendant’s conduct caused the alleged victim substantial emotional distress, but the standard for what constitutes substantial emotional distress is inherently personal. Conduct that one person finds frightening, another might find merely annoying. Repeated phone calls from a former romantic partner might cause genuine fear in some situations and mild inconvenience in others. The subjective nature of this element means the prosecution’s case often depends heavily on the alleged victim’s testimony about how the conduct made them feel, and that testimony must be scrutinized carefully for exaggeration, fabrication, and ulterior motive.
The Rubin Firm challenges the emotional distress element by examining whether the alleged victim’s claimed distress is supported by objective evidence such as medical records, counseling records, changes in behavior patterns, or reports to third parties, and by investigating whether the accuser has a motive to exaggerate, such as gaining leverage in a custody dispute, obtaining an injunction that forces the defendant out of a shared home, or retaliating against a former partner who ended the relationship.
Cyberstalking in the Digital Age
Florida’s stalking statute explicitly encompasses cyberstalking, which is defined as engaging in a course of conduct to communicate, or to cause to be communicated, words, images, or language through electronic mail, electronic communication, or the internet, directed at a specific person, causing substantial emotional distress to that person and serving no legitimate purpose. The rise of social media, text messaging, email, and other digital communication platforms has dramatically expanded the scope of conduct that can be prosecuted under the cyberstalking provisions.
Cyberstalking cases present unique evidentiary issues. Digital communications leave a trail that the prosecution can use as evidence, but they also provide the defense with a complete record of what was actually said, unlike in-person encounters where the only evidence may be the accuser’s recollection. The Rubin Firm analyzes the full context of digital communications, because messages that appear threatening when presented in isolation may be entirely benign when viewed in the context of an ongoing conversation, a mutual exchange, or a relationship dynamic that the prosecution chooses not to acknowledge.
Why The Rubin Firm for Stalking Defense
injured? Let Us Help You Get Justice. Free consultation. No fees unless we win your case.
Penalties for Stalking in Florida
Stalking Charges in the Context of Domestic Relationships
A significant percentage of stalking charges arise from the breakdown of romantic relationships. When a relationship ends, particularly when the breakup is contested, conduct that might have been welcome during the relationship, such as repeated phone calls, showing up at the other person’s workplace, or sending numerous text messages, can be recharacterized as stalking. Former partners who feel threatened by continued contact may seek injunctions and file criminal complaints, and the prosecution may pursue charges under the pro-prosecution policies that apply to domestic violence-related offenses.
The defense in relationship-based stalking cases often involves demonstrating that the alleged conduct was part of a mutual exchange, that the alleged victim invited or reciprocated the contact, that the conduct had a legitimate purpose such as resolving shared financial obligations or exercising parental rights, or that the accuser is using the criminal justice system as a tool for leverage in a concurrent family law dispute. The Rubin Firm investigates the full context of the relationship, including the communication history between the parties leading up to the accusation, to present the court with an accurate picture rather than the selective narrative the prosecution relies on.
Steps to Take If Accused of Stalking
Stop all contact with the accuser
Preserve all communications:
Save text messages, emails, social media exchanges, voicemails, and any other records of communication between you and the accuser. These records may show that contact was mutual or invited.
Do not violate any court orders:
If an injunction has been issued, comply with every term without exception. Violation of an injunction is a separate criminal offense.
Contact The Rubin Firm:
We investigate the credibility of the accusation and build a defense that addresses every element the prosecution must prove. Call (772) 283-2004.
Injunctions for Protection Against Stalking
In addition to criminal prosecution, an alleged victim of stalking may petition the circuit court for a civil injunction for protection against stalking under Florida Statutes Section 784.0485. The court can issue a temporary injunction without notice to the respondent based solely on the petitioner’s sworn allegations, followed by a hearing within 15 days at which both parties can present evidence and testimony. If a final injunction is issued, it can prohibit the respondent from contacting the petitioner, coming within a specified distance of the petitioner’s home, workplace, or school, and engaging in any conduct directed at the petitioner. The injunction remains in effect until the court modifies or dissolves it, which can be indefinitely.
Violating a stalking injunction is a first-degree misdemeanor carrying up to one year in jail, and repeated violations can escalate to felony charges. The injunction itself also creates the basis for an aggravated stalking charge if any subsequent conduct directed at the petitioner occurs, because stalking in violation of a court order is a third-degree felony. This means that a civil injunction obtained on disputed allegations can create ongoing criminal exposure for years into the future. The Rubin Firm represents defendants at injunction hearings, challenging the petitioner’s allegations and presenting evidence that the conduct does not meet the statutory definition of stalking, to prevent the entry of an order that restricts the defendant’s freedom and creates this ongoing criminal risk.
The Legitimate Purpose Defense
One of the most important defenses to a stalking charge is that the defendant’s conduct served a legitimate purpose. The harassment component of the stalking definition requires that the conduct serve no legitimate purpose. This means that conduct motivated by a lawful objective, such as exercising parental rights, attempting to resolve a shared financial obligation, conducting lawful business, engaging in protected speech or protest activity, or pursuing a valid legal claim, does not constitute harassment under the statute even if the other person found the conduct unwelcome or distressing.
This defense is particularly relevant in cases arising from contested divorces and custody disputes, where one party may characterize the other’s attempts to exercise parental rights, communicate about the children, or resolve property issues as stalking. It is also relevant in landlord-tenant disputes, business disagreements, and neighbor conflicts where one party uses the criminal justice system to gain tactical advantage. The Rubin Firm investigates the full context of the defendant’s conduct, identifies every legitimate purpose that motivated the behavior, and presents that evidence to counter the prosecution’s characterization of the conduct as purposeless harassment.
Collateral Consequences of a Stalking Conviction
A stalking conviction creates a criminal record for an offense that employers, licensing boards, and the general public view as predatory behavior. Background checks that reveal a stalking conviction create assumptions about the defendant’s character that are difficult to overcome. Employment in fields involving contact with vulnerable populations, children, or the public may be permanently foreclosed. Professional licensing boards may deny or revoke licenses. Custody courts may use the conviction as evidence of a propensity for controlling or threatening behavior. For non-citizens, a stalking conviction may be classified as a crime involving moral turpitude or a crime of violence, triggering deportation or inadmissibility. And the firearms prohibition that accompanies injunctions for protection adds another layer of consequence that affects the defendant’s daily life and constitutional rights. These collateral consequences underscore the importance of fighting stalking charges vigorously, because the label of stalker carries social and professional consequences that persist long after any criminal sentence is served.
We’re Here To Heil You Recover Compensation For:
- Injury or damages
- Injury & Medical
- Injury or damages
Serving Stuart, Martin County, and the Treasure Coast
The Rubin Firm defends individuals facing stalking and harassment charges in Stuart, Palm City, Jensen Beach, Hobe Sound, Indiantown, Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce, Vero Beach, Jupiter, and throughout Martin, St. Lucie, Indian River, and Palm Beach Counties.
Referral Partnerships for Stalking Cases
Attorneys across the Treasure Coast trust The Rubin Firm for stalking and harassment defense referrals. Contact us to discuss a referral.
Frequently Asked Questions About Stalking Charges in Stuart
What is the difference between stalking and harassment?
Under Florida law, harassment is a component of the stalking definition. Stalking requires willful, malicious, and repeated following, harassing, or cyberstalking of another person. Harassment is defined as a course of conduct directed at a specific person that serves no legitimate purpose and causes substantial emotional distress. A single act of harassment does not constitute stalking; a pattern is required.
Can I be charged with stalking for sending text messages?
Yes. Florida’s cyberstalking provisions cover electronic communications including text messages, emails, and social media. If the messages are part of a course of conduct that serves no legitimate purpose and causes substantial emotional distress, they can form the basis of a stalking charge.
What is aggravated stalking?
Aggravated stalking occurs when the defendant makes a credible threat to the victim during the course of stalking, stalks a minor under 16 years of age, or stalks in violation of a court order such as an injunction for protection. Aggravated stalking is a third-degree felony carrying up to 5 years in prison.
Can stalking charges be dropped if the accuser recants?
The prosecutor makes the charging decision, not the accuser. However, an accuser’s recantation undermines the prosecution’s case and can be powerful evidence for the defense. The prosecutor may still pursue charges based on other evidence, but the case becomes significantly weaker when the primary witness recants.
Will a stalking conviction affect my custody case?
Yes. A stalking conviction, particularly one involving a former partner or family member, can significantly affect custody proceedings. Courts consider violence and threatening behavior when evaluating parental fitness and the best interests of the child.
$150 Million
Accused of Stalking? The Accusation Does Not Tell the Whole Story.
Stalking charges depend on subjective elements that can be challenged. The Stuart stalking defense lawyers at The Rubin Firm investigate the accuser’s credibility and motivation, present the full context of the relationship, and fight to protect your reputation and your freedom.
Call (772) 283-2004 for a confidential consultation. Complete our contact form or chat live.
4.9 Rating on 
